Dalrock gives the best logical answer for lower divorce in later marriages and it’s one I happen to agree with… the odds of remarriage is vastly lower for a woman in her 40’s and beyond that it is for a woman in her 20’s… 460 Novaseeker says: September 5, 2014 at 1:19 pm @457 — Well, that’s fine if you just want to discount N’s importance because you can’t prove it in the case of a specific woman short of putting her polygraph. It is a huge risk factor to be ignoring, however. There *are* ways to suss it out, based on environment, family, friend circles, her own attitudes towards sex expressed in interacting with you and on and on. Of course those don’t land on an *exact* number, but will get you in the ballpark, and if asked directly she very well may lie (and some are also able to deceive in other ways, too). But, you have to become a bit better at detecting deception from other people in general (and women in particular). In any case, Keith, if you really want to ignore N go right ahead — it’s your life. But be aware that there are numerous studies which suggest that it’s a huge factor in marital risk assessment. As for Dalrock, as far as I can remember, he has never suggested, from all I have read of him over the years, that everything is fine if the girl is simplyoung — that is, it doesn’t matter if her N is high, or what kind of girl she is, or how she behaves and so on, as long as she is young. What he has said is that it becomes very hard for Christians in particular to expect their children to be celibate until age 28 if they are all following a life script that precludes marrying younger than that. He’s talking about a specific group of people, and not the garden variety 22 year old girl who already has a significant N (he has a post from several years ago about what to look for in a wife, for example, and it isn’t “if she’s under 23, it’s all good, but if she’s over 23, keep looking”). https://pad.opensenselab.org/s/98WWGbH9I https://md.eris.cc/s/qqcp2J896I https://hack.depta.dev/s/VYFNVGD5W https://codi.mcloud.digital/s/P34JiEpXoe https://codi.cermat.org/s/HkQO-DE1Me https://pad.aleph.world/s/AjNaMlEfW https://notes.phys-el.ru/s/iX3-zFr2nc https://www.magicwall.io/s/B1cXHvNkfe https://hedge.soundar.eu.org/s/OKpcZ87NF https://pad.batsense.net/s/tN1fZmKM4 https://pad.ifland.dev/s/Y0lkAzkaZ https://pad.hackingfor.eu/s/BFXaG3gRL https://docs.vaala.cloud/s/OpEXbBrE3z https://hedgedoc.mathphys.info/s/md3yTTmzr- https://notes.avdm.nl/s/D5UK_hS5n https://pad.pythonf.de/s/6zItFpoML https://note.floodfire.tw/s/SyxDD_4yfl https://talkpad.3oe.de/s/PWalM32M3 https://codimd.tyhou12.xyz/s/_R9Nmz8ZN https://codi.teuber.dev/s/Cjzqwj6nE https://codi.filler.cc/s/rysmlcN1Gx https://gcp.mydns.jp/s/981HsdSx8 https://codimd.mim-libre.fr/s/S5p19sgcs https://doc.myceliandre.fr/s/zfB1WyeFV https://pad.yuka.dev/s/GjhBleWdps https://md.kolms.eu/s/S1_JdcVkMx https://hackmd.syndace.dev/s/t9Mfex5yi https://hedge.debile.co/s/VGXy4psRK